Walls & Ceilings
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Breaking News
  Web-only Features
  Video
  Blog
  Podcasts
  Bulletin Board
  Career Center
  Case Studies
  White Papers
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Product Focus
  Product Toolbox
  Calendar of Events
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  W&C Architect Archives
  Blue Book
  AEC Store
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Showrooms
  Product of the Month
  Manufacturer Profile
  New Product Buzz Guide
  Web Showcase
  Trade Show Directory
  Photo Gallery
  Market Research
  Special Sections
  Excellence In Design
  High Performance Building Envelope
  High on Safety
  Convention Companion
  Tool & Equipment Guide
  WC Info
  Media Kit
  Connect with W&C: Connect with Walls and Ceilings on Facebook Connect with Walls and Ceilings on LinkedIn Connect with Walls and Ceilings on Twitter
W&C Blog  
Gulf Coast Oil Leak: Environmental Catastrophe vs. U.S. Independence
by Tim Fausch
May 28, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

/Oil Slick.JPG
Photo Credit: Eric Gay, AP from MSNBC.


I’m an ardent fan of the great outdoors. I run and bike on nature trails. I’m the family recycling nut. My favorite vacation destinations are Zion National Park, The Grand Canyon, Glacier National Park, and Bryce Canyon. I love lakes, rivers and the ocean.

Career wise, my first job with BNP Media was as an editor on Solar Engineering & Contractingmagazine.  I am a big fan of our two all green brands, Environmental Design + Construction and Sustainable Facility.

So you can appreciate why I was distressed to learn via MSNBC that the oil spill in the Gulf Coast is bigger than the slick caused by the Exxon Valdez (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37353392/ns/gulf_oil_spill/?GT1=43001) and is now the worst in U.S. history.

At first, media coverage focused on the fiery accident and tragic death of the oil workers. Soon after, coverage shifted to the ongoing environmental impact, accusations of poor emergency response, and who is to blame. Federal support of offshore drilling has turned into efforts to curtail offshore drilling.

I certainly understand why environmentalists are outraged. No one wants to see such damage, some of which might take decades to reverse. Fisherman, shrimpers, and resorts are being severely impacted.

Clearly, this oil spill is a mega disaster.

And yet, I am hoping that our righteous anger doesn’t cause elected officials to make emotional or political decisions that could hurt the U.S. in other ways. Banning offshore drilling would lead to greater dependence on foreign sources and higher prices for gas and oil products, thus increasing the cost of doing business in the U.S.

A good first step is to take an analytical approach to this mess. So I was encouraged when I read this oil leak analysis (www.economist.com/science-technology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=16160853&source=features_box_main) published by The Economist and the steps BP Oil is taking to fix it. It was good to see coverage that focused on cause-and-effect, rather than name-calling and finger-pointing.

I know what some of you are thinking. Why not simply ramp up our energy conservation efforts and develop alternative energy sources so we can be done with off shore drilling?

This approach was popular in the early 1980s when the Carter administration set a goal of generating 20% of the country’s energy through renewable sources. Unfortunately, the conversation rates of those sources were not cost-competitive then, and as far as I can tell, most are not competitive on a major scale today. I wish they were.

This blog reaches engineers, designers, manufacturers, architects, consultants, contractors and many other pros who are all smarter and more technically savvy than me. I would love to hear your reactions to the oil spill and how we should move forward.

Post your comments to this blog or email me at fauscht@bnpmedia.


Tim Fausch
fauscht@bnpmedia.com
Tim Fausch is publishing director of BNP Media’s Architecture, Engineering & Construction, Security and Mechanical Systems Groups, a collection of more than 20 trade magazines, Web sites and e-newsletters.  Just don't ask him to use any actual tools. Email Tim at fauscht@bnpmedia.com.


  Comments (2)Post a Comment
Title: conservation


Tim,
Energy conservation was one of the President Carters programs back in the 80's, the other was the 40% renewable energy tax credit which I think was a huge waste of tax dollars. Of course a lot was learned about the limitations of renewables back then, I'm guessing that is the point your making. Hopefully some of those leasons won't have to be re-learned by a new generation of ambitious entrepreneurs getting into solar and other alternatives.

Energy conservation doesn't mean spending a lot of money in many instances. Using what we have more wisely, and making homes & business more energy efficient can be as simple as adding some insulation and sealing cracks.


Title: Oil Spill Gulf Of Mexico 2010


Planetresource.net has a Eco friendly solution to clean up the tragedy British Petroleum has created, please watch the video animation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60bdQQQ3iVw and pass this along to as many people as you know.

One person can still make a difference in this world, is that simple interactions have a rippling effect. Each time this gets pass along, the hope in cleaning our planet is passed on.


 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 















BNP Media