Walls & Ceilings
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Breaking News
  Web-only Features
  Video
  Blog
  Bulletin Board
  Career Center
  Case Studies
  White Papers
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Product Focus
  Product Toolbox
  Calendar of Events
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  W&C Architect Archives
  Blue Book
  AEC Store
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Showrooms
  Manufacturer Profile
  Product & Lit Showcase
  Web Showcase
  Trade Show Directory
  Photo Gallery
  Market Research
  Special Sections
  Excellence In Design
  High Performance Building Envelope
  High on Safety
  Convention Companion
  Tool & Equipment Guide
  WC Info
  Media Kit
Use
Email this Article Print View

View Blog Archives
Trowel Talk: It Just Makes Cent$
by William E. Rogers ACP
December 14, 2009



I was recently confronted by someone who believes this whole “global warming” thing is just a big lie. They said that we shouldn’t waste any time, effort or tax dollars on reducing our carbon footprint because “CO² is nothing but plant food …”

OK, I get it. Al Gore has become the poster child for the green movement and liberal groups, such as Green Peace, have been hollering about saving the environment for decades, so some folks are suspicious that this must be about leftist politics.

Let’s, for the sake of argument, say these folks are right. There have been a several Ice Ages in the Earth’s history and each time it’s bounced back to the point it now successfully sustains a whole bunch of us Homo sapiens. Are there other (non-political) reasons to go green? Yes.

* Breathing cleaner air, drinking cleaner water, and eating food that is not loaded with growth hormones or toxic pesticides will help us all live longer, healthier lives.

* We have depleted most of our old growth forests to meet the housing boom of the 1950s and 60s. We have continued to consume fossil fuel like there is an unlimited supply. When we begin to recognize that we have finite amount of most natural resources, doesn’t it make sense to better manage what we have left to insure the next generation, and the next, will have the ability to enjoy the fruits of our world?

* By using EIFS and other high R-value claddings we better insulate our structures and reduce energy consumption and the cost! Not to mention putting some of our good wall and ceilings craftsmen back to work.

* By using pervious concrete, we allow rainfall to naturally enter the aquifer and reduce the amount of water needlessly being diverted down the storm drain, depleting our water supply or worse yet, into a water treatment facility where we pay to clean rainwater.

* If we can reduce our energy consumption and develop alternative methods to meet our energy requirements, then we wean ourselves off sending boatloads of cash to Middle East countries—that sounds like a good thing to me. 

So as far as I am concerned, it’s not about politics; it’s about common sense. If you agree or disagree, share your perspective.


William E. Rogers ACP
William Rogers is the executive director of the Plasterers and Cement Masons Job Corps Training Program, a national training opportunity for America’s disadvantaged youth, sponsored by a partnership between AWCI, OPCMIA and the U.S. Dept. of Labor.

  Comments (2)Post a Comment
Title: Technology improving energy consumption awareness


At the climate change talks in Copenhagen a group of advocates for energy awareness pressed governments to aid in developing a smart grid that would increase consumers awareness of their energy consumption. Done in Europe, the group projected 15% decrease in usage, over a decade, the equivalent of taking millions of cars off the highway or closing down many coal burning electric plants. Just a way for technology to reduce our carbon footprint.


Title: Global Warming


PLEASE!!! Don't believe the entire package that you are being sold. True, there is global warming. But co2's overall impact is in question. Our ability to make an impact on the production of co2 is exremely minimal if their isn't a global effort. In fact, if China doesn't comply and continues on its path any effort made by the other nation will be completely in vein. The active burden and the financial burden can not be placed only on the American tax payer! It's offensive that the Obama administration would offer 100 Billion. Please, stop for one moment and for once, lets think this through. It would be a complete disservice to our children to through billions at a situation in hopes that we can buy a fix. Our incomprehendible spending will destroy us before any fluctuation in temp!!!!


 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
BNP Media