Walls & Ceilings
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Breaking News
  Web-only Features
  Video
  Blog
  Bulletin Board
  Career Center
  Case Studies
  White Papers
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Product Focus
  Product Toolbox
  Calendar of Events
  Special Sections
  Excellence In Design
  High Performance Building Envelope
  High on Safety
  Convention Companion
  Tool & Equipment Guide
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  W&C Architect Archives
  Blue Book
  AEC Store
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Showrooms
  Manufacturer Profile
  Product & Lit Showcase
  Web Showcase
  Trade Show Directory
  Photo Gallery
  Market Research
  WC Info
  Media Kit
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
IPAF AND ASC OPPOSE PROPOSED SAFE USE GUIDELINE STANDARDS

November 4, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Recently, The American Society of Safety Engineers and American National Standards Institute A10 committee have drafted proposed new standards that cover the purchase, rental, lease, maintenance, use and training in use of aerial platforms used for lifting personnel in construction. Along with other organizations including the American Rental Association, the International Powered Access Federation has lodged an official objection on behalf of its members against the passage of the proposed A10.29 AWP safe use guideline standard.

IPAF members believe that safe use guidelines are already covered in the current ANSI A92 standards, and the hazards and risk associated with safe use in construction are no different than the hazards and risks found in all other industries using AWPs. The development of a second standard will either be duplicative or introduce inconsistencies between the two standards.

IPAF further believes that it should not be supported as it will result in confusion for end users and create different requirements for operators of the same equipment depending on the work they perform and the industry they work in. There is no unique language in the proposed standard that does not apply to any user in any industry. The AWP industry only needs one standard, the existing ANSI A92 standard, and, should the need arise, all industries have the opportunity to have their concerns heard and addressed on the ANSI A92 committee.

The proposed standard has specific language that IPAF members object to, but as IPAF opposes the adoption of the entire standard for reasons above, there is no need to address each provision in detail.

The Accredited Standards Committee A92 also believes this proposed standard is duplicative and in direct conflict with existing A92 series of standards.

The A92 series of standards currently covers various Aerial Work Platforms devices. These include, but are not limited to, vehicle-mounted elevating and rotating devices, self-propelled aerial work platforms, boom-supported aerial work platforms, and manually propelled aerial work platforms.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
BNP Media