Walls & Ceilings
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Breaking News
  Web-only Features
  Video
  Blog
  Podcasts
  Bulletin Board
  Career Center
  Case Studies
  White Papers
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Product Focus
  Product Toolbox
  Calendar of Events
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  W&C Architect Archives
  Blue Book
  AEC Store
  Classified Ads
  Industry Links
  Showrooms
  Product of the Month
  Manufacturer Profile
  New Product Buzz Guide
  Web Showcase
  Trade Show Directory
  Photo Gallery
  Market Research
  Special Sections
  Excellence In Design
  High Performance Building Envelope
  High on Safety
  Convention Companion
  Tool & Equipment Guide
  WC Info
  Media Kit
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
STOGUARD BEC Air Barrier Challenge

August 27, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Sto Corp. has passed both air and moisture testing during a recent BEC/BSA 2010 Air Barrier Design Challenge held in late May.

Hosted by Architectural Testing Inc. in Chelmsford, Mass., ten teams of practicing design and construction professionals assembled 4-foot-by-8-foot building envelope mock-up panels with a variety of membrane and fluid-applied air and moisture barrier systems. The Sto team used StoGuard, which was the only product tested that did not leak in both the air and water tests, including at the sensitive material joints or at screw holes, the company reported.

The two testing methods used in the challenge were the ASTM E 783 (field test for air leakage) and the ASTM E 1105 (field test for moisture leakage).

“Even though all the wall assemblies in this test passed the air leakage test, Sto was the only one that had absolutely no moisture leakage,” said Lisa Petsko, Sto product manager for StoGuard. “The challenge results point to the fact that a ‘thicker’ membrane is not always better, meaning that membrane systems that claim the they are more effective because they are thicker (sometimes up to 90 mils), did not perform as well as a fluid-applied system like StoGuard at around 6 mils on the wall. Why pay for more when it is not needed?” 


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.














BNP Media