IPAF AND ASC OPPOSE PROPOSED SAFE USE GUIDELINE STANDARDS
IPAF members believe that safe use guidelines are already covered in the current ANSI A92 standards, and the hazards and risk associated with safe use in construction are no different than the hazards and risks found in all other industries using AWPs. The development of a second standard will either be duplicative or introduce inconsistencies between the two standards.
IPAF further believes that it should not be supported as it will result in confusion for end users and create different requirements for operators of the same equipment depending on the work they perform and the industry they work in. There is no unique language in the proposed standard that does not apply to any user in any industry. The AWP industry only needs one standard, the existing ANSI A92 standard, and, should the need arise, all industries have the opportunity to have their concerns heard and addressed on the ANSI A92 committee.
The proposed standard has specific language that IPAF members object to, but as IPAF opposes the adoption of the entire standard for reasons above, there is no need to address each provision in detail.
The Accredited Standards Committee A92 also believes this proposed standard is duplicative and in direct conflict with existing A92 series of standards.
The A92 series of standards currently covers various Aerial Work Platforms devices. These include, but are not limited to, vehicle-mounted elevating and rotating devices, self-propelled aerial work platforms, boom-supported aerial work platforms, and manually propelled aerial work platforms.